I’ve been writing an interpreter for QBasic for quite some time now, since March 28th to be precise. This was something I always wanted to do. In the process, I am learning Rust, which I like a lot. But, as I implement feature after feature, I am learning QBasic as well, especially things a developer normally never has to worry about.
Dynamic Typing? Nope
The first misconception I had was that QBasic is a dynamic typed language. In Ruby, you can do the following:
i = 42 puts i i = "is the answer" puts i
i gets first the numeric value 42 and then the string value “is
In QBasic, that doesn’t work. You can’t re-assign a variable to a different type. In fact, it goes a bit beyond that. The name of the variable dictates the type of values it can hold.
A = 42 ' works A = "oops" ' does not work
In my interpreter, rusty basic, I refer
to these variable names as bare. They consist of just letters and optionally numbers,
Side note: I figured out variable names in QBasic can only contain dots for crying out loud, which I haven’t supported yet.
By default, bare names hold float values of single precision. So the assignment
A = 42 is actually creating a single value.
To create a different variable, we need to use what I call in rusty basic a qualified name: a variable name followed by a type qualifier. There are five such characters:
%declares an integer
&declares a long
!declares a single (which is the default)
#declares a double
$declares a string
A% = 42 B& = 5653376574648 C! = 3.14 D# = 45644564.3353 E$ = "hello world"
When coding the interpreter, I often worry about edge cases. Things that a developer wouldn’t normally do, but out of curiosity I dive into. An example is, what would happen if I define the same variable name with different type qualifiers:
A% = 42 A$ = "the answer" PRINT A%, A$
Will the above program work? Turns out it works just fine, as far as QBasic is
A$ are two different variables.
Default type resolution
I mentioned that a bare variable holds a single float value by default. Consider the following program:
A = 41 A! = A! + 1 PRINT A
It prints 42. As the
A variable is a single, it is resolved to
are the same variable.
It is possible to change the default type to one of the other 4 types with
DEFINT (for integers),
DEFLNG (for longs),
DEFDBL (for doubles)
DEFSTR (for strings). There’s also of course
DEFSNG for singles. In fact,
in the games that came with QBasic, Gorillas and Nibbles, the first statement
in the game is:
' Set default data type to integer for faster game play DEFINT A-Z
The above statement says that any variable that starts with a letter between A and Z (so all variables) is an integer. I don’t know why integers aren’t the default to begin with, might be some backwards compatibility issue with an even older BASIC flavor.
If we use this statement in the above program:
DEFINT A-Z A = 41 A! = A! + 1 PRINT A
It will print 41 instead. Now we have two variables
A (which is now an integer, so
In rusty-basic, I have a layer called “linting” which sits between getting the parse tree and generating instructions. Among other things, the linter makes sure that all bare names are resolved to qualified names and that there are no mismatch types or duplicate definitions.
Making it more complicated: DIM A AS STRING
I’m currently in the process of implementing the
DIM statement. With
you can declare a variable without an assignment. It’s even possible to declare
arrays and user defined types, but I haven’t gone that far in implementation.
There’s two ways you can declare a variable with
DIM. The one is exactly the same
as seen so far:
DIM A DIM A$ A = 42 PRINT A! A$ = "the answer" PRINT A$
The program works fine. The variable
A is a bare variable resolved to a single (so
it’s the same as
A$ is a different variable.
It gets complicated when using the second way of declaring a variable:
DIM A AS INTEGER A = 42 PRINT A
The keywords that match the five data types are
For the lack of a better name, I call this an extended variable (naming things is hard) while I call the variables seen earlier as compact. It’s important to flag this as something special in the interpreter because it follows different naming resolution rules.
An extended variable cannot coexist with other variables of the same bare name. The following throw a duplicate definition error:
Trying to use the same extended variable with different type (this one makes sense):
DIM A AS INTEGER DIM A AS STRING
Trying to use an extended integer with a bare compact (which should be single):
DIM A AS INTEGER DIM A
Trying to use an extended integer with a compact string:
DIM A AS INTEGER DIM A$
Trying to use an extended integer with an implicit compact string on assignment:
DIM A AS INTEGER A$ = "hello"
Side note: every such edge case discovery has become a unit test in rusty basic.
You could argue at least the latter might be something the interpreter should allow, given it allows it for compact style variables, but it doesn’t.
The next difference is that
A now is resolved to
A% (as it declared as
an integer), bypassing the default type resolution rules:
DIM A AS INTEGER A% = 42 PRINT A
So it’s still possible to use a type qualifier, as long as it matches the type
declared at the
Again, this is all probably things that a developer wouldn’t do. It would be also tempting on my side to just say “a variable must be unique, throw an error otherwise” and call it a day. But I’m curious to discover how it is supposed to work.